Sources

References

Abboud, R., & Claussen, C. (2016). The use of Outcome Harvesting in learning-oriented and
collaborative inquiry approaches to evaluation: An example from Calgary, Alberta. Evaluation
and program planning, 59, 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.005

Amed, S., Shea, S., Pinkney, S., Wharf Higgins, J., & Naylor, P. J. (2016). Wayfinding the live 5-2-
1-0 initiative – At the intersection between systems thinking and community-based
childhood obesity prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health, 13(6), 614-630. doi:10.3390/ijerph13060614

Archibald, T., Sharrock, G., Buckley, J., & Cook, N. (2016). Assumptions, conjectures, and other
miracles: The application of evaluative thinking to theory of change models in community
development. Evaluation and program planning, 59, 119-127. doi:
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.015

Auspos, P. & Kubisch, A. (2012). Performance management in complex, place-based work: What
it is, what it isn’t, and why it matters. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute. Retrieved from
http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/images/rcc/Aspen_Performance_
Management.pdf

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2010). Child Protection Australia 2008-09.
Retrieved from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/cws/cpa07-08/cpa07-08.pdf

Battiste, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First Nations education: A literature
review with recommendations. Ottawa, Ont : Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
Bennett, M. & Auger, A. (2013). First Nations and non-Aboriginal children in child protection
services. Prince George, BC: National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health. Available at:
http://www.nccahccnsa.ca/Publications/Lists/Publications/Attachments/7/protective_services_EN_web.pdf

Berkowitz, B. (2001). Studying the outcomes of community based coalitions. American Journal
of Community Psychology, 29, 213-227.

Blackstock, C. & Trocmé, N. (2005). Community-based child welfare for Aboriginal children:
Supporting resilience through structural change. In M. Ungar, (Ed.) Handbook for working with
children and youth: Pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts  (pp. 105-120).
Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Blackstock, C., Trocmé, N. & Bennett, M. (2004). Child maltreatment investigations among
Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal families in Canada. Violence Against Women, 10(8), 901-916.

Blamey, A., & Mackenzie, M. (2007). Theories of change and realistic evaluation: Peas in a pod
or apples and oranges? Evaluation, 13(4), 439-455. doi:10.1177/1356389007082129

Bosworth J., Bruns, E.J., Peterson, C., Rast, J., & Walker, J. (2006). Spreadsheets, service
providers, and the statehouse: Using data and the wraparound process to reform systems
for children and families. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3), 201-212.
doi:10.1007/s10464-006-9074-z

Bradford, N. (2005). Place-based public policy: Towards a new urban and community agenda for
Canada. Family Network Research Report F|5. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Policy
Research Networks.

Bradford, N., & Chouinard, J. A. (2009). Learning through evaluation? Reflections on two federal
community-building initiatives. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 24(1), 51-77.

Blair, E., Busain, L., & Tucker, P. (2015). Pathways to opportunity: Applying the principles of an
effective, Indigenous comprehensive community initiative toward a thriving community.
Retrieved from:
https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/173965/Blair_Busian_Tucker-
Pathways%20to%20Opportunity.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Brown, (2010). Evaluating and learning from community change. In A. Kubisch, P. Auspos, P.
Brown & T. Dewar (Eds.), Voices from the Field III: Lessons and Challenges from Two Decades of
Community Change Efforts (pp. 95-105). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.

Cabaj, M. (2014). Evaluating collective impact: Five simple rules. The Philanthropist, 26(1),
109-124.

Carter, V. (2010). Factors predicting placement of urban American Indian/Alaskan natives into
out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(5), 657-663.

Carter, V. (2009). Prediction of placement into out-of-home care for American Indian/Alaskan
natives compared to non-Indians. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(8), 840-846.

Coffman, J. (2007). A framework for evaluating systems initiatives. Retrieved from:
http://pathways.nccp.org/assets/pdf/Coffman2007.pdf

Connell, W., Kubisch, A., Schorr, L. & Weiss, (1995). New approaches to evaluating community
initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts. New York: The Aspen Institute.

Cook, J. R. (2015). Using evaluation to effect social change: Looking through a community
psychology lens. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(1), 107-117.
doi:10.1177/1098214014558504

Dean-Coffey, J., Farkouh, N. & Reisch, A. (2012). Dimensions of change: A model for community
change efforts. The Foundation Review, 4(3), 42-64. doi 10.4087/FOUNDATIONREVIEW-D-
12-00010.1

Delfabbro, P., Hirte, C., Rogers, N., & Wilson, R. (2010). The over-representation of young
Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people in the South Australian child system: A
longitudinal analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1418-1425.

Farrow, F.& Schorr, L. (2011). Expanding the evidence universe: doing better by knowing
more. Washington, Center for the Study of Social Policy.

Feinberg, M. E., Jones, D., Greenberg, M. T., Osgood, D. W., & Bontempo, D. (2010). Effects of
the communities that care model in Pennsylvania on change in adolescent risk and problem
behaviors. Prevention Science, 11(2), 163-171. doi:10.1007/s11121-009-0161-x

Fiester, L. (2011). Measuring change while changing measures: Learning in, and from,
the evaluation of making connections. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Available at:
http://www.evaluationroundtable.org/documents/cs-measuring-change.pdf

Foster-Fishman, P., Nowell, B. & Yang, H. (2007). Putting the system back into systems change:
A framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 197 – 215.

Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Watson, E. R. (2012). The ABLe change framework: A conceptual and
methodological tool for promoting systems change. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 49(3-4), 503-516. doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9454-x

Frederico, M., & Whiteside, M. (2016). Building school, family, and community partnerships:
Developing a theoretical framework. Australian Social Work, 69(1), 51-66.
doi:10.1080/0312407X.2015.1042488

Gardner, B. (2011). Comprehensive community initiatives: Promising directions for “wicked”
problems? Horizons Policy Research Initiative, 1-9. Retrieved from:
http://vibrantcanada.ca/files/promising_directions_for_wicked_problems.pdf

Gillespie, J., Supernault, G. & Abel, M. (2014). Community networking: A promising practice for
Aboriginal child welfare. In D. Badry, M. Montgomery, D. Fuchs, & S. McKay (Eds.),
Reinvesting in Families, Securing a Brighter Future: Voices from the Prairies (pp. 201-219).
Regina, SK: University of Regina.

Hart, M. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: The development of an
indigenous research paradigm. Indigenous Voices in Social Work, 1(1), 1-16.

Harris, M. & Hackett, W. (2008). Decision points in child welfare: An action research model to
address disproportionality. Child and Youth Services Review, 30, 199-215.

Hill, J. R., & Thies, J. (2010). Program theory and logic model to address the co-occurrence of
domestic violence and child maltreatment. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(4), 356-364.
doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.03.001

Johnston, A. L. (2013). To case study or not to case study: Our experience with the Canadian
Government’s evaluation practices and the use of case studies as an evaluation methodology
for First Nations programs. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 28(2), 21-42.

Kaufman, J. S., Crusto, C. A., Quan, M., Ross, E., Friedman, S. R., O’Rielly, K., & Call, S. (2006).
Utilizing program evaluation as a strategy to promote community change: Evaluation of
a comprehensive, community-based, family violence initiative. American Journal of
Community Psychology, 38(3), 191-200. doi:10.1007/s10464-006-9086-8

Kelly, T. (2010). Five simple rules for evaluating complex community initiatives. Community
Investments, 22(1), 19-22. Available at: http://www.frbsf.org/communitydevelopment/
files/Spring_CI_2010a.pdf

Kingsley, G. T., Coulton, C. J., & Pettit, K. L. (2014). Strengthening communities with
neighborhood data. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from
http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/13805_urban-kingsley.pdf

Komro, K. A., Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2016). Research design issues for
evaluating complex multicomponent interventions in neighborhoods and communities.
Translational Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 153-159. doi:10.1007/s13142- 015-0358-4

Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Kubisch, A., Auspos, P., Brown, P., Buck, E., & Dewar, T. (2011). Voices from the field III: Lessons
and challenges for foundations based on two decades of community-change efforts. The
Foundation Review, 3(1), 138-149. doi: 10.4087/FOUNDATIONREVIEW- D-11-00010

Lavergne, C., Dufour, S., Trocmé, N. & Larrivée, M. (2008). Visible minority, Aboriginal and
Caucasian children investigated by Canadian child protective services. Child Welfare, 87(2),
59-76.

Lee, K. S., & Chavis, D. M. (2012). Cross-case methodology: Bringing rigour to community and
systems change research and evaluation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,
22(5), 428-438. doi:10.1002/casp.1131

Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, (Winter),
36-41. Retrieved from: http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/collective_impact

Pendall, R., & Hendey, L. (2016). Revitalizing Neighborhoods: The Federal role. Metropolitan
Housing and Communities Policy Centre. Retrieved from:
http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/85236/revitalizing-neighborhoods-thefederal-
role_0.pdf
Peters, R. D., Petrunka, K., Khan, S., Howell-Moneta, A., Nelson, G., Pancer, S. M., & Loomis, C.
(2016). Cost-savings analysis of the better beginnings, better futures community-based
project for young children and their families: A 10-year follow-up. Prevention Science, 17(2),
237-247. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0595-2

Provan, K., Veazie, M., Staten, L. & Teufel-Shone, N. (2005). The use of network analysis to
strengthen community partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 603-613.

Public Health Agency of Canada. (2010). Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and
neglect – 2008: Major findings. Ottawa.

Rasmussen, C. M., Armstrong, J., & Chazdon, S. A. (2011). Bridging Brown County: Captivating
social capital as a means to community change. Journal of Leadership Education, 10(1), 63-
82. doi:10.12806/V10/I1/RF4

Rogers, P. J. (2008). Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of
interventions. Evaluation, 14 (1), 29-48. doi: 10.1177/1356389007084674

Sinha, V., Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., Fast, E., Thomas-Prokop, S. et al. (2011).
Kiskisik Awasisak: Remember the children: Understanding the overrepresentation of First
Nations children in the child welfare system. Ottawa, ON: Assembly of First Nations. Available
at: http://cwrp.ca/sites/default/files/publications/en/FNCIS-
2008_March2012_RevisedFinal.pdf

Sridharan, S., Campbell, B., & Zinzow, H. (2006). Developing a stakeholder-driven anticipated
timeline of impact for evaluation of social programs. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2),
148-162. doi:10.1177/1098214006287990

Thoburn, J. (2007). Globalisation and child welfare: Some lessons from a cross-national study
of children in out-of-home care. Social Work Monographs, UEA, Norwich.

Tilbury, C. (2009). The over-representation of indigenous children in the Australian child welfare
system. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18(1), 57-64.

Torjman, S. & Leviton-Reid, E. (2003). Comprehensive community initiatives. Ottawa, ON:
Caledon Institute of Social Policy.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Calls to action. Winnipeg, MA.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honoring the truth, Reconciling for the
future. Winnipeg, MA.

Trocmé, N., Knoke, D. & Blackstock, C. (2004). Pathways to the over-representation of
Aboriginal children in Canada’s child welfare system. Social Service Review, 78(4), 577-600.

Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd
ed.). New York: Zed Books.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families,
Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2009). The AFCARS
report: Preliminary estimates for FY 2008 as of October 2009 (Report #16).

Weaver, L., Born, P., & Whaley, D. (2010). Approaches to measuring: Community change
indicators. Waterloo, ON: Tamarack Institute. Retrieved from:
http//www.leaders4health.org/images/uploads/files/MeasuringCommunityChange.pdf

Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax, NS, Canada:
Fernwood.

Evaluation Literature Reviewed for Synthesis

Scholarly Articles

  1. Abboud, R., & Claussen, C. (2016). The use of Outcome Harvesting in learning-oriented and
    collaborative inquiry approaches to evaluation: An example from Calgary, Alberta. Evaluation and
    program planning, 59, 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.005
  2. Amed, S., Shea, S., Pinkney, S., Wharf Higgins, J., & Naylor, P. J. (2016). Wayfinding the
    live 5- 2-1-0 initiative – At the intersection between systems thinking and community-based
    childhood obesity prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
    13(6), 614-630. doi:10.3390/ijerph13060614
  3. Archibald, T., Sharrock, G., Buckley, J., & Cook, N. (2016). Assumptions, conjectures, and
    other miracles: The application of evaluative thinking to theory of change models in community
    development. Evaluation and program planning, 59, 119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.015
  4. Blamey, A., & Mackenzie, M. (2007). Theories of change and realistic evaluation: Peas in a
    pod or apples and oranges? Evaluation, 13(4), 439-455. doi:10.1177/1356389007082129
  5. Bosworth J., Bruns, E.J., Peterson, C., Rast, J., & Walker, J. (2006). Spreadsheets, service
    providers, and the statehouse: Using data and the wraparound process to reform systems for children and families. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3), 201-212.
    doi:10.1007/s10464-006-9074-z
  6. Bradford, N., & Chouinard, J. A. (2009). Learning through evaluation? Reflections on two
    federal community-building initiatives. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 24(1), 51-77.
  7. Cook, J. R. (2015). Using evaluation to effect social change: Looking through a community
    psychology lens. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(1), 107-117.
    doi:10.1177/1098214014558504
  8. Feinberg, M. E., Jones, D., Greenberg, M. T., Osgood, D. W., & Bontempo, D. (2010). Effects
    of the communities that care model in Pennsylvania on change in adolescent risk and problem
    behaviors. Prevention Science, 11(2), 163-171. doi:10.1007/s11121-009-0161-x
  9. Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Watson, E. R. (2012). The ABLe change framework: A conceptual and
    methodological tool for promoting systems change. American Journal of Community Psychology,
    49(3-4), 503-516. doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9454-x
  10. Frederico, M., & Whiteside, M. (2016). Building school, family, and community partnerships:
    Developing a theoretical framework. Australian Social Work, 69(1), 51-66.
    doi:10.1080/0312407X.2015.1042488
  11. Hill, J. R., & Thies, J. (2010). Program theory and logic model to address the co-occurrence
    of domestic violence and child maltreatment. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(4), 356-364.
    doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.03.001
  12. Johnston, A. L. (2013). To case study or not to case study: Our experience with the Canadian
    Government’s evaluation practices and the use of case studies as an evaluation methodology for
    First Nations programs. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 28(2), 21-42.
  13. Kaufman, J. S., Crusto, C. A., Quan, M., Ross, E., Friedman, S. R., O’Rielly, K., & Call, S.
    (2006). Utilizing program evaluation as a strategy to promote community change: Evaluation of a
    comprehensive, community-based, family violence initiative. American Journal of Community
    Psychology, 38(3), 191-200. doi:10.1007/s10464-006-9086-8
  14. Komro, K. A., Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2016). Research design issues for
    evaluating complex multicomponent interventions in neighborhoods and communities. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 153-159. doi:10.1007/s13142- 015-0358-4
  15. Lee, K. S., & Chavis, D. M. (2012). Cross-case methodology: Bringing rigour to community and
    systems change research and evaluation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(5), 428-438. doi:10.1002/casp.1131
  16. Peters, R. D., Petrunka, K., Khan, S., Howell-Moneta, A., Nelson, G., Pancer, S. M., & Loomis, C. (2016). Cost-savings analysis of the better beginnings, better futures community-based project
    for young children and their families: A 10-year follow-up. Prevention Science, 17(2), 237-247.
    doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0595-2
  17. Rasmussen, C. M., Armstrong, J., & Chazdon, S. A. (2011). Bridging Brown County: Captivating
    social capital as a means to community change. Journal of Leadership Education, 10(1), 63-82.
    doi:10.12806/V10/I1/RF4
  18. Rogers, P. J. (2008). Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of
    interventions. Evaluation, 14 (1), 29-48. doi: 10.1177/1356389007084674
  19. Sridharan, S., Campbell, B., & Zinzow, H. (2006). Developing a stakeholder-driven anticipated
    timeline of impact for evaluation of social programs. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 148-
    162. doi:10.1177/1098214006287990

Books/Book Chapters

  1. Coombe, C. M. (2012). Participatory approaches to evaluating community organizing and
    coalition building. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health
    and welfare, (pp. 346-365). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Grey Literature

  1. Aspen Institute. (n.d.). Measuring Community Capacity Building. Retrieved from:
    http://vibrantcanada.ca/files/measuring_community_capactiy_building.pdf? hstc=163327267.6d
    ef3324361e35051466560fd106ca02.1486170312042.1487800734937.1488341225407.4& hssc
    =&hsCtaTracking=2cd82d78-e684-40ee-a793- 09647e670583%7Caac714e9-a837-4c81-8d37- 9dfbd9f6d2fa
  2. Blair, E., Busain, L., & Tucker, P. (2015). Pathways to opportunity: Applying the principles
    of an effective, Indigenous comprehensive community initiative toward a thriving community.
    Retrieved from: https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/173965/Blair_Busian_Tucker-
    Pathways%20to%20Opportunity.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  3. Cabaj M. (2014). Evaluating collective impact: Five Simple Rules. The Philanthropist, (July
    4). Retrieved from: https://thephilanthropist.ca/2014/07/evaluating-collective-impact-five-simple- rules/
  4. Coffman, J. (2007). A framework for evaluating systems initiatives. Retrieved from:
    http://pathways.nccp.org/assets/pdf/Coffman2007.pdf
  5. Dean-Coffey, J., Farkouh, N. & Reisch, A. (2012). Dimensions of change: A model for community
    change efforts. The Foundation Review, 4(3), 42-64. doi: 10.4087/FOUNDATIONREVIEW-D-12-00010.1
  6. Fiester, L. (2011). Measuring change while changing measures: Learning In, and from, the
    evaluation of making connections. Baltimore, Maryland: The Anne E. Casey Foundation. Retrieved
    from: http://www.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/aecf- MeasuringChangeWhileChangingMeasures-2011.pdf
  7. Gardner, B. (2011). Comprehensive community initiatives: Promising directions for “wicked”
    problems? Horizons Policy Research Initiative, 1-9. Retrieved from:
    http://vibrantcanada.ca/files/promising_directions_for_wicked_problems.pdf
  8. Kingsley, G. T., Coulton, C. J., & Pettit, K. L. (2014). Strengthening communities with
    neighborhood data. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from
    http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/13805_urban-kingsley.pdf
  9. Kramer, M., Parkhurst, M., & Vaidyanathan, L. (2009). Breakthroughs in shared measurement and
    social impact. FSG Social Impact Advisors . Retrieved from:
    http://www.strongerfamilies.co/files/Breakthroughs_in_Shared_Measurement_complete. pdf.
  10. Kubisch, A., Auspos, P., Brown, P., Buck, E., & Dewar, T. (2011). Voices from the field III:
    Lessons and challenges for foundations based on two decades of community-change efforts. The
    Foundation Review, 3(1), 138-149. doi: 10.4087/FOUNDATIONREVIEW-D-11-00010
  11. Pendall, R., & Hendey, L. (2016). Revitalizing Neighborhoods: The Federal role. Metropolitan
    Housing and Communities Policy Centre. Retrieved from:
    http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/85236/revitalizing-neighborhoods- the-
    federal-role_0.pdf
  12. Tamarack Institute. (2017). Developing useful evaluations. Waterloo, ON: Tamarack Institute.
    Retrieved from:
    https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/316071/Resources/Tools/Developing%20Useful%20Evaluation20July%202017.pdf? hssc=163327267.2.1504739557710& hstc=163327267.137bcd3c8a46bcae09dc48d6fa456456.1504739557709.1504739557709.1504739557709.1& hsfp=1496530038&hsCtaTracking=6ec20cbf-706b-4067-b703-b581e30875ae%7Ccd3596be-8783-423f-8fc6-
    ae409da0b804
  13. Trent, T. R., & Chavis, D. M. (2009). Scope, scale, and sustainability: What it takes to
    create lasting community change. The Foundation Review, 1, 96-114. doi:
    10.4087/FOUNDATIONREVIEW-D-09-00007
  14. Weaver, L., Born, P., & Whaley, D. (2010). Approaches to measuring community change
    indicators. Waterloo, ON: Tamarack Institute. Retrieved from:
    https://www.leaders4health.org/images/uploads/files/Measuring_Community_Change.

Sources for Discussion of Indigenous Ways of Knowing and Approaches to
Research

  1. Absolon, K. (2011). Kaandossiwin, this is how we come to know: Indigenous worldviews and
    methodologies in search for knowledge. Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.
  2. Battiste, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First Nations education: A
    literature review with recommendations. Ottawa, Ont: Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
  3. Bruyere, G. (Amawaajibitang) (2009). The spirit of dreaming: Traditional knowledge for
    Indigenous social work. In R. Sinclair M.A. Hart, and G. Bruyere (Eds.), Wicihitowin: Aboriginal Social Work in Canada, Winnipeg, MA: Fernwood.
  4. Cochran, P. A. L., Marshall, C. A., Garcia-Downing, C., Kendall, E., Cook, D., McCubbin, L..
    . . . Kendall, E. (2008). Indigenous Ways of Knowing: Implications for Participatory Research and
    Community. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 22-27.
  5. Duran, B. & Duran, E. (2000). Applied postcolonial clinical and research strategies. In M.
    Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision, (pp. 86-100). Vancouver: UBC Press.
  6. Ermine, W. (1995). Aboriginal epistemology. In M. Battiste and J. Barman (Eds.), First
    Nations Education in Canada: The Circle Unfolds (pp. 101-112). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
  7. Hart, M. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: The development of an
    indigenous research paradigm. Indigenous Voices in Social Work, 1(1), 1-16.
  8. Kovach, M. (2005). Emerging from the margins: Indigenous methodologies. In L. Brown & S.
    Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, Indigenous, & anti-oppressive approaches (pp.
    19-36). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
  9. Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts.
    Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  10. Lavallee, L. (2009). Practical applications of an Indigenous framework and two qualitative
    Indigenous research methods: Sharing circles and Anishnabe symbol-based reflection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 21-40.
  11. Kurtz, D. (2013). Indigenous Methodologies: Traversing Indigenous and Western worldviews in
    research. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples. 217–229.
  12. Little Bear L. (2000). Jagged worldviews colliding. In M. Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming
    Indigenous voice and vision (pp. 77-85). Vancouver: UBC Press.
  13. Rice, B. (2005). Seeing the world with Aboriginal eyes: A four dimensional perspective on human and non-human values, cultures and relationships on Turtle Island. Winnipeg, MB: Aboriginal Issues Press.
  14. Lavallee, L. F. (2009). Practical Applications of an Indigenous Framework and Two Qualitative
    Indigenous Research Methods: Sharing Circles and Anishnabe Symbol-Based Reflection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 21-40.
  15. Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2ed.). New York: Zed Books.
  16. Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax, NS, Canada: Fernwood.